
League of Women Voters of Blount County 2006 Candidate Survey
Name _Thomas G. McCroskey_____Phone_865-681-7037____________________
Candidate for __General Sessions Judge, Division One_________________________
Please
write your answers in the space provided or use a separate sheet, and return
your survey in the enclosed stamped envelope. It is very important that you
write legibly. Please consider
e-mailing your completed survey by requesting an electronic survey at rderycke@bellsouth.net
The
League of Women Voters will acknowledge receipt of your completed survey.
I. Qualifications and experience:
1.
Bachelor of Arts, 1984,
2.
Doctor of Jurisprudence, 1990,
I
have served as Acting General Sessions Judge in
1. Maryville Kiwanis Club, 1993 to 2000, and now
2006 to the present.
2. Leadership Blount, Class of 1995.
3. Blount County Habitat for Humanity, 2000
(through Broadway United
4.
5. Legal Aid of
6. Blount County Bar Association, 1993 to
present; served as President in 2000.
I
own a rental house in
1. Decisiveness
2. Organization
3. Patience
F. What
unique qualities, besides the above leadership skills, do you have to
contribute to this office?
I
believe that I always try to maintain an open mind, and pay attention to all
sides of an argument before making a decision.
I also believe in the rule of law, setting aside my own personal
opinions and trusting in the guidance provided by the laws and court cases that
affect the matter then before me.
Finally, I’ve been fortunate to have received a good education, and to
value the continued acquisition of knowledge and learning.
II. Questions about your understanding of the office you
are seeking:
1. To serve
and protect the legal needs of the community.
2. To
maintain the integrity and dignity of the Court.
3. To render fair, accurate and meaningful
judicial decisions to the people in a particular matter who come before me.
1. Appropriate development of
resources and infrastructure in light of growth demands.
2. Education.
3. Respectful diversity.
Purely
as a General Sessions Judge, I believe that any impact I would make would and
should be only incidental. By that, I
mean that I would hope my impact would only be as a fair arbiter of disputes
over the specifics of carrying out resolutions of any such issues between the parties
interested in them. Personally, I expect
to use any influence I have as a result of being a Judge in
PLEASE SEE ANSWERS TO SECTIONS III. AND IV.
ON PAGE 3 AND 4.
III. Positions on specific issues of importance in
A.
Means for insuring the fair and
respectful treatment of all
B.
Promotion of greater diversity in our hired and appointed government
officials and employees
C.
Reconciling the potentially competing interests of growth/development
and adequate infrastructure in our county, including the application of the
Hunter Growth Strategy
D.
The environmental impact of development and/or non-attainment status
with the EPA
E.
Identifying and resolving conflicts of interest of public officials
F.
The consolidation of:
1. city and county schools
2. city and
county government
3. or a feasibility
study on consolidation
G.
Health care
IV. Questions for
CANDIDATES FOR JUDGE: Use a separate sheet to
answer these questions.
ANSWERS TO: III.
Positions on specific issues of importance in Blount County
A. Means for insuring the fair and respectful
treatment of all Blount County citizens, regardless of race, gender,
religion or ethnic background, given recent concerns about racism and bigotry
in our county.
As a Judge, I would keep two things in mind at all
times in regards to this issue. First is the Constitutional guarantee of equal
protection under the law for everyone appearing before me. No one will receive favor or disfavor in my
Court because of ANY constitutionally protected status, such as their race,
gender, religion or ethnic background.
Next, and just as important, all people will be treated with respect in
my Court. I will strive to leave
everyone who appears before me with the sense that they received a fair
hearing, that the system worked and that the law relevant to the facts of their
case was applied fairly and correctly, even if they did not get the result for
which they hoped.
B. Promotion of greater
diversity in our hired and appointed government officials and employees.
I must respectfully decline to answer this question,
as I believe that issues addressed by it could come before me if I am elected
to the General Sessions Judgeship for which I am running.*
C. Reconciling
the potentially competing interests of growth/development and adequate
infrastructure in our county, including the application of the Hunter Growth
Strategy.
I must respectfully decline to answer this question,
as I believe that issues addressed by it could come before me if I am elected
to the General Sessions Judgeship for which I am running.*
D. The environmental impact of development and/or non-attainment status
with the EPA.
I must respectfully decline to answer this question,
as I believe that issues addressed by it could come before me if I am elected
to the General Sessions Judgeship for which I am running.*
E. Identifying
and resolving conflicts of interest of public officials.
I must respectfully decline to answer this question,
as I believe that issues addressed by it could come before me if I am elected
to the General Sessions Judgeship for which I am running.*
E. The consolidation of:
1. city
and county schools
2. city
and county government
3. or a
feasibility study on consolidation
.
I must respectfully decline to answer this question,
as I believe that issues addressed by it could come before me if I am elected
to the General Sessions Judgeship for which I am running.*
G. Health care
I must respectfully decline to answer this question,
as I believe that issues addressed by it could come before me if I am elected
to the General Sessions Judgeship for which I am running.*
*My responses to these questions are made with the
provisions of the Judicial Ethics Commission’s Advisory Opinion No. 05-03,
dated
IV.
Questions for CANDIDATES FOR JUDGE:
By always knowing, respecting and strictly enforcing the laws and procedures relevant to the matter before him or her. A judge should also respect the efforts made by law enforcement personnel, and keep in mind the difficult circumstances under which those persons sometimes find themselves. It would only make it harder for a police officer to spend the time and effort it takes to arrest, charge and prosecute someone if that officer felt that those efforts would be ignored or belittled by the Court. Creative thinking can help too: I’ve always admired Judge Brewer’s idea of catching the people who plead guilty to driving without a license, then immediately go out to their cars and drive away. The bottom line is that a Judge must always, whether in Court or as a private citizen, comport himself or herself with the utmost respect for the law, if he or she expects that respect from the community they serve.
There are a number of things a judge can do that should help. First, the judge should impress upon the perpetrator of the abuse or crime the fact of enhanced future punishment should there be retaliation for the victim’s decision to prosecute the crime. Next, a judge should be aware of and make known to the victim any community resources that might be available to help him or her, such as Haven House or counseling services. And always, a judge must be sensitive to the role every party to a crime or dispute occupies in each case: criminals are owed justice, witnesses are owed respect and victims are owed compassion.